About Rights

A Right is a Sanction of Independent Action.

A Sanction is authoritative permission.

That’s why thier source determines thier nature!

Are they from God? Are they Intrinsic? Am I hard-wired with them? Are they “born” in the Battlefield? Or are they gifts from the state?

If they come from God as the Declaration of Independence asserts, they are non-negotiable (unalienable).


If they are gifts from government, as the UN claims in thierInternational Covenant on Economic, Cultural, & Social Rights Article 4, then all they have do to to violate them is to write a new “law.”


Negative Rights have stood the test of time. Thou Shall Not Kill or Steal protects your life and property from others. So is “The government Shall make no law, violate, abridge, infringe, deny, disparage ect…

The change towards Positive Rights came subtlely because most people generally do not understand the difference between the right to HAVE something and the right to SEEK Something. Education, Health Care, and Marriage are things we have the right to seek in the pursuit of happiness, they are Goods and Services, NOT Rights. When goods and services of others become rights, then they are cumpulsory, and the providers have essentially become slaves because they have no right to refuse. Equivilant to saying “I have the right to have others work my cotton fields without compensation.” That is Slavery. Then the jounrney from a Defensive Shield of Rights to an Aggressive Sword of Rights is complete.

The Bill of Rights (Amendments 1 – 10)

Rights and Privileges

Rights are directly linked to life and property. The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution agrees: “The Right of the People to be secure  in thier persons, papers, houses, and effects shall not be violated.” Another way to put is: “I have the right to walk on my property whenever I want. I do not have the right to walk on your property, that is a privilege that you extend to me that can be revoked at anytime.”

Rights and Powers

Rights belong to Individuals, Powers belong to Groups. The language of the Constitution supports this when it talks about the Powers of the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches of government. The Tenth Amendment talks about, “Those Powers not delegated to the United States by this Constitution…” A group of people may be able to physically overpower an individual and violate the rights of a single person, that does not make it right. This does not prevent individuals from also possesing power; if your Kung-Fu is good enough or you carry a weapon skillfully, you may be able to prevail against seemingly insurmountable odds and nuetralize the situation by exercising your right to self defense.

In reality, gay rights, black rights, women’s rights are actually excercises in power. Rights belong to and are practiced and enjoyed by individuals. Any special favors given to members of certain groups that exclude others are actually privileges extended by government at taxpayer expense, thus redistributing other people’s money by force to give advantage to a select few. The danger of the concept of groups of people having special rights or enjoying favor with any government is the danger to other groups who fall out of favor. What does it mean for them?

James Madison, by John Vanderlyn


In 1785, James Madison wrote an essay challenging a propsed law in his native Virginia called “Religious Assessments” that addressed the very issue of what it means to prefer a religion and the impact to those members of other religions who fall out of state favor:

“The free men of America did not wait till usurped power had strengthened itself by exercise, and entangled the question in precedents. They saw all the consequences in the principle, and they avoided the consequences by denying the principle.”



What about States Rights?

When used in the context of the Tenth Amendment against to machinations of the federal government or in the supremacy of cities and counties therin, the term States Rights is generally accepted by most because those speaking of it understand the concept. Yet, if we agree that Rights are for Indivisuals and Power is for Groups, then the more correct term is State Soveriegnty. According to the Constitution, States can assert thier power in both directions, within and without.

Taking a license

When Patrick Henry was walking the Streets of Culpeper Virginia, he came across an minister who was whipped for three days until he eventually died. What crime did he commit? He did not take a license! This incident is what sparked Patrick Henry to make his very famous “Give me Liberty of Give Me Death” speech which became a rallying cry for the American Revolution.

A license is an arbitray means for any government or private organization to transform a right into a privilege while making money in the process, thus taking way your rights and selling them back to you; all in the name of safety of course.

While most reasonable people agree that there should be basic minimum standards to protect the public from fraudsters and unskilled practitioners from physically endangering the public, so they usually tolerate licenses and see them as a good thing. The general public is unaware that States may issue licences according to thier own laws and usually specify that they apply only to those people and companies engaged in commercial enterprise and utilizing public resources for private gain. That is why the definition of Transportation according to law deals with the shipment of people and products for a profit. If taxis, buses, and limozines are transporting people on public roads, then the speed limit and licenses apply to them. If there are trucks with massive loads, perishable food, or dangerous chemicals on the highway, then they are engaged in Transportation and the states may regulate them in the interest of public safety.

Unbeknownst to most people in the United States is that the terms Operator, Driver, and Vehicle, apply to Transportation for commercial enterprise and not towards private individuals who are Traveling in thier personal Auto who are not engaged in making money on the highway. The Supreme Court agrees that a person does not need a license to travel on the public roads.

U.S. Supreme Court Says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Roads

There are ways to challenge a Traffic Ticket or Citation in court if you are traveling in your personal auto on public roads for infractions that apply only to Transportation or for engaging in these things for nonprofit; however, we must all pick and choose our battles.

For those who choose to better understand engage the system in Traffic Courts:

Flexing Your Rights

When encountering local Police, county Deputy Sheriffs, or State Troopers on the highway, it is advisable not to air out your grievances with them on the streets where they are king. That being said, we should always flex our rights, particularly when it comes to private information and personal, vehicle, or home searches. It is important that you tell them that, “I do not conscent to searches,” They may violate your rights anyway; however, if you are arrested, issued a citation,  or have property confescated, you can challenge them in court if you have asserted your rights. Always act respectful and courteous to the police when asserting your rights, this is ultimately profitable for both sides, even if it does not go well for you at the scene.


A Brief History of Money

G Edward Griffin presents a One Hundred Trillion Dollar bill from Zimbabwe (worth about $30 US) at his “Crash Course on Money” at Seattle, WA in 2009.

Simply put, money is the most readily accepted Medium of Exchange. It is a Warehouse of Value that constitutes one half of every economic transaction. It is also a Measure of Performance of the marketplace or the health of a nation’s production and consumption in the economy. Money in a free market is also a Certificate of Accomplishment for meeting the demands within a society. When it is obtained by fraud, force, coercion, it is an indicator of something far more sinister.

There have historically been four kinds of money: Commodity, Receipt, Fractional Reserve, and Fiat.

In this discussion with Benjamin Knight at “We The Vigilant” on the “Maverick Podcast”, we go through a brief history of money.

The Maverick Podcast #69: The History of Money and The Federal Reserve Scam

Major Topics Include:

  • What is Money?
  • The Barter System/ Salt and the Salary
  • Jesus & Money, a Biblical Perspective
  • The true source of physical Wealth on this Earth
  • Four types of money Commodity/ Receipt/ Fraction Reserve/ and Fiat
  • The Clipping Coins by the king & British Talley Sticks
  • The Byzantine Empire’s Stable Economy for 800 years
  • Why wars always have always caused a departure from Gold
  • Rothschild Meeting of 1773
  • Colonial Script & “Not worth a Continental”
  • Hamilton / Dollar / Coinage Act of 1792
  • Spanish Dollar vs British Pound & monetary controls
  • Hamilton & Washington/ Jefferson & Aaron Burr
  • 1805: Rothschild Takes London
  • Constitutional Money, Hamilton, 10th Amendment & Washington
  • Article 1, Section 8, Clause 5
  • The Bank of North America & The Bank of the United States
  • Murray Rothbard and the Depression of 1819
  • How Andrew Jackson killed the Bank
  • Deflation in 19th Century
  • The Civil War & Greenbacks/  Lincoln & the Government Prerogative
  • The “Crime of 73”
  • Frank Baum & The Wizard of Oz
  • The Supreme Court 1874 Decision on a Central Bank
  • Turn of the century Insolvent Bank Runs
  • The Aldrich Plan vs the Federal Reserve Plan
  • The 1910 Conference at Jekyll Island
  • The Federal Reserve System
  • 1913: The Federal Reserve Act, 16th 17th Amendments, and World War 1
  • Century of Big Banking & Total Warfare Lew Rockwell
  • Fed Reserve Case for Boosting Aggregate Demand
  • John Maynard Keynes, Chicago, Socialists, Austrian
  • The Economists: Adam Smith, Ricardo, John Maynard Keynes, Thomas Malthus, Krugman, Ludwig von Mises, Fredrick Hayek, Murray Rothbard,  Henry Hazlitt, Ron Paul, Tom Woods, Peter Shciff, Eustace Mullins, and G Edward Griffin
  • The Gold Standard & Barbarians
  • FDR Confiscates Gold from Americans in 1933
  • 1935: Federal Reserve Building and the Supreme Court Building
  • 1944: The Bretton-Woods Agreement (Semi-Gold Standard / IMF/ World Bank
  • 1971: Nixon’s “Temporary Suspending” of the Gold Standard
  • The Stock Market Panic of 1989
  • The “Boom & Bust” Business Cycle
  • Low Interest Rates vs Animal Spirits
  • 2008 TARP Banker Bailouts
  • The Crash: Timothy Geithner (CFR) & Henry Paulson’s (CFR) Waiver for his Ethics
  • Shotgun Wedding Bank of America Merrill Lynch
  • $19 Trillion Debt
  • Printing Money: Quantitative Easing / Targeted Investments/ Monetizing Debt
  • Federal Reserve Response to Trump with Interest Rates
  • Greenspan, Bernanke, Yellen,  LeGarde, &  Strauss Kahn
  • The Great Works: Economics in One Lesson, Human Action, The Great Depression. End the Fed & Case for Gold, The Road to Serfdom, and Meltdown


The Maverick Podcast #69: The History of Money and The Federal Reserve Scam

If you want to dive deeper into what money is and how it works, here are some great resources:







The New American Magazine Interviews Amendment Avenger about the 2016 Presidential Election

AA in studio

Just prior to one of the biggest political upset in American history, I had an opportunity to talk with Alex Newman from the New American Magazine. The purpose of the interview was to determine if the black vote is as homogeneous as people are led to believe.  In the article, published on November 5, just 3 days prior to election day, I break down why I did not support the Clinton campaign and even articulated my concerns for a Trump presidency as it relates to Constitutional issues.



George Soros is an Illegal Alien


by Benjamin Knight and Amendment Avenger

Who is George Soros?

Soros made billions over several decades by manipulating the dollar market and manufacturing economic collapses to make a profit. He is responsible for shorting the Pound in England and nearly imploding the country’s economic system in 1992 along with destroying the Malaysian and Indonesian economies in 1998. Soros also used his personal hedge fund to benefit from the 2008 market crash by executing pre-planned money movements and short selling during the onset of the crisis.

The 85-year-old Hungarian-American is a a major proponent of the one world government, one world currency, plutocratic framework which advocates for the complete eradication of borders.

In addition, Soros is responsible for funding various divide and conquer groups including Black Lives Matter, a Marxist cult used to drive a wedge between the races in America and distract the public from fighting back against the evils of globalism. If there’s a left-wing “progressive” hate group stirring up civil unrest, it’s likely Soros-funded.

The plutocrat is a major Hillary Clinton backer with his most recent donation totaling $8 million.

Why is Soros an illegal alien?

Soros is a Nazi collaborator who aided in confiscating property from Jews and rounding up over 500,000 of them, many of whom were his friends and family, to send them to die in gas chambers. When recollecting these events the billionaire anti-capitalist often refers to his Nazi past as “the happiest time of my life.”

With that in mind, take a look at 8 U.S. Code 1182:



Section (E) explicitly states that “participants in Nazi persecution, genocide or the commission of any act of torture or extrajudicial killing” should be barred from entering the United States.  Part (IV) of the document outlines that anyone associated with the government of a German ally (Hungary) who “assisted, or otherwise participated in the persecution of any person because of race, religion, national origin, or political opinion is inadmissible.”

Soros, a known Nazi collaborator, should therefore be banned from America.

The Code of Laws of the United States of America is a compilation of official federal statutes – the many rules and regulations outlined in the document regarding naturalization and citizenship are perfectly constitutional in accordance to Section 5 of the 14th Amendment:

“The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.”

Article 1 Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution states that Congress has the right to “establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States.”

The Constitution is a basic framework for the law but it is up to representatives in Congress to pass legislation aimed at clarifying the law as they relate to our basic rights and freedoms.

According to U.S. Code, the Constitution and the law it is glaringly obvious that globalist, Clinton-donor and Nazi collaborator George Soros should be permanently banned from the United States effective immediately.

We the Vigilant Logo


US Constitution: Understanding the Main Body

The Maverick Podcast #61: The Constitution Special w/ The Amendment Avenger

If you’re looking for expert analysis on what really happened before the document was ratified and what each article really means, you’ve come to the right place.


Host Benjamin Knight and frequent guest The Amendment Avenger present: The Constitution Special – a lesson on the main body of the Constitution and American history leading up to that point.

Listen for the following:

-The Three-Fifths Compromise myth.

-The truth about gun rights.

-A backstory on our Founding Fathers.

-What the executive branch can/cannot do, a full breakdown.

-The purpose of the separation of powers.

-The Philadelphia Convention.

-Why Anti-Federalists were really federalists.

-Misinformation being perpetuated by high schools and universities across the country debunked.

And more!


Study Guide Presentation to follow along with podcast:

Amendment Avenger Constitution PDF

Amendment Avenger Constitution PPTX


Link to Uninterrupted Podcast:

The Maverick Podcast #61: The Constitution Special w/ The Amendment Avenger


A Breakdown of the Lesson:

Prelude to the Constitution

Federalists and Anti-Federalists

Structural Overview


Legislative Powers

Forbidden Powers

Executive Powers

Judicial Powers

The Republic and Beyond

Source Document: The Constitution of the United States

Constitution of the United States

National Archives: Charters of Freedom

Works of Advocacy and Opposition:

Federalist Papers

Anti-Federalist Papers


After Reading the Main Body of the Source Document, Using the Study Guide, and reviewing Federalist & Anti-Federalist Papers


Be sure to investigate the State Ratification Conventions




Our National Ensign: “Olde Glory”
















The Rise and Resistance to Globalism in the US

UN General Assembly

The United Nations General Assembly at New York City

For as long as there has been an America, there have been those who seek to exploit her prosperity and might: Pirates, who operate in international waters outside the rule of law, elitists of the high seas, plundering the wealth of nations and leaving the smoldering husks of conquest in their wake. Time and time again, these international banks, corporations, and the politicians they finance, have effectively used strategic alliances to engage in economic warfare against their competition while incrementally using escalating crises they generate to establish global political hegemony.

For decades, the movements of these command-and-controllers have been closely monitored and resisted only by academics, deep insiders, and the most highly knowledgeable of watchdog groups. All of that is changing. Now, with the advent of the internet and the subsequent amalgamation of incalculable data, the average computer savvy individual with access to electronic media can conduct their own investigations with greater ease. This has notably led to a shift in the knowledge base of the grassroots and an exponential surge of anti-globalist groups around the world, particularly in the United States.

While the young America was in its inception as British colonies in revolt, another kind of revolution was taking place in Europe that would change the dynamics of empires forever. In 1773, Mayer Amschel Rothschild organized a meeting of the money powers of manufacturing and banking to discuss his plan. By combining their resources they would gain complete control of the economic and political sphere. Politicians would be servile and obedient to them. They would control all outlets of public information and provide all manner of vice to systematically corrupt the youth of all nations. Finally, they would fund all factions in war to draw all nations into their debt and use crises to push for new world order of a one-world government that is completely owned and operated by them. This plan would involve implementation by stealth until such a moment where no cunning or force could undermine it (Mullins, 1991).

In a similar fashion to the Rothschild meeting of the late eighteenth century, a secret gathering of elitists took place in a hotel room at a luxury resort in Jekyll Island, Georgia in 1910. With representatives of the Rockefellers’, Rothschild’s, the Vanderbilt banking family, Senator Nelson Aldrich, and others, constituted one quarter of the wealth of the entire planet. At this meeting the Federal Reserve System was devised. The voting and signing into law of the Federal Reserve Act by Woodrow Wilson on December 23, 1913 was done under the radar when most of Congress was home for Christmas (Griffin, 1994).

According to author and professor Murray N. Rothbard of the Ludwig von Mises Institute, “The Federal Reserve System virtually controls the nation’s monetary system, and it is accountable to no one. It has no budget, is subject to no audit, and no Congressional Committee knows of, or can truly supervise its operations.”(Rothbard 1996 ).  All of their meetings are held in secret and half the owners are foreign nationals (Mullins 1991). They print money, issue credit “out of thin air,” and finance both sides of every war (Griffin 1994). Lew Rockwell, founder of the Mises Institute adds, “The century of central banking is also the century of total warfare.” Shortly after the formation of the Federal Reserve, World War I was in full swing.

During this, “War to end all wars,” a National Relief Fund was established and Republican Herbert Hoover was dispatched by Democrat Woodrow Wilson to live in Belgium and work for Emile Francqui, the twelfth richest man in Europe and an owner of the Federal Reserve.  Hoover was sent under the guise of a National Relief Fund program to feed the war orphans in Belgium. After trading 200,000 slaves from the Kaiping copper mines in China to the Congo for Franqui, Hoover was deemed the perfect humanitarian for just such an occasion. Instead of helping orphans however, he used US taxpayer funds to provide relief to German army by shipping food and supplies because they were losing interest in war and could no longer afford it (Mullins 1991). Levying war against the several States and providing aid and comfort to the enemy is clearly an act of treason according to Article III Sec. 3 of the US Constitution. By feeding the German army in WW I, Hoover committed treason.

After the war, a League of Nations was proposed by Woodrow Wilson; however, the US Senate blocked America’s entry. In the interim between the world wars, an American branch of the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) was incorporated in 1921 and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) was born. Their mission was to incrementally change the political atmosphere in favor of the internationalists (Perloff, 1988). Out of the CFR’s “Informal Agenda Group” The United Nations would ultimately be formed after World War II by the Rockefellers at the Presidio Naval Shipyard in 1945 (Jones, 2006), not by nations tired of war (Perloff 2009).

Also, between the wars was the German consortium IG Farben. Germany made a determination that one of the reasons they lost the war was because they ran out of gas. Since Germany was rich in coal, IG Farben developed a process called hydrogenation that converted up to fifty percent of the weight of coal into fuel. They used this technology as leverage to convince the Rockefeller’s to let them merge with Standard Oil. Ultimately merging with over 2000 companies through the United States and ninety three countries, the agreement was to allow all joint oil exploration outside of Germany be led by the US, and all joint ventures for petrochemical pharmaceuticals be led by Germany and Professor Bayer from Bayer Pharmaceuticals, a founding member of IG Farben (Griffin 1975).

The German war machine of the next World War would be fueled almost entirely from oil that was converted from coal. The oil was good for German panzers manufactured by Ford and for warships; however, it was too crude for the Luftwaffe, Germany’s air force, and the planes had to be supplemented with an additive from Standard Oil in the US. While the German word Farben is benign, meaning dye-stuffs, a tribute to the company’s origin, the use of IG stands for Interessengemeinschaft, meaning “Community of Interest,” or in plain English, a cartel (Griffin, 1975).

While the CFR and IG Farben were moving forward with their international agenda between the world wars, other factions of elitists in the US, more nationalist in nature, believed that brute force was a superior method for implementation of their plans and accelerated their plans. Brigadier General Smedley Darlington Butler testified in Congress to the McCormack/ Dickstein Committee on Un-American Activities from 1934-1935 about a fascist plot by the American Nazi Party to assassinate President Franklin D. Roosevelt and an attempt to takeover of the federal government. He implicated members of Citibank, the DuPont’s, and Remington Firearms (Parfrey, 2003).

By blowing the whistle, two time Medal of Honor recipient Smedley Butler, affectionately known as “Old Gimlet Eye” to his marines, had single-handedly stopped the Nazi takeover of America. Time Magazine, controlled by banker JP Morgan, lambasted Butler in an article titled “A plot without plotters” (Parfrey, 2003).  Although the committee did agree with Butler, they did not release their findings to the public at the time (McCormack). In his timeless classic War is a Racket, Butler lays out the horrors of war while explaining who makes the profits and who pays the bills. The thirty three year veteran acknowledged being a “high class muscle man for big business,” adding, “profits are measured in dollars and losses are measured in lives” (Butler 1935).

Another example of war as a racket for big business transpired shortly after the US involvement in the Korea under UN direction.  In 1954, the Central American multinational United Fruit Company had a big problem.  Jacobo Arbenz came to power in Guatemala. He campaigned on a land reform bill to combat a seventy percent ownership of land by only three percent of the people. In order to prevent disruption of their monopoly, they colluded with the CIA to launch a public relations campaign against Arbenz. Despite Guatemala having no official diplomatic relations with the USSR and no Russian Embassy, accusations of Guatemala as Soviet satellite were enough to justify US pilots bombing Guatemala City and overthrowing Arbenz (Perkins, 2004).

Meanwhile in that same year, across the Atlantic, another internationalist event that would shape the economic and political direction of America was taking place. Much like the 1773 meeting between the Rothschild and European captains of industry, and the Jekyll Island meeting in 1910, the Bilderberg Group met in secret to combine over 120 of the world’s most influential multinational corporations, heads of state, bankers, consulting firms, and media moguls, to come to a consensus and make public policy, while behind closed doors. The elitist confab had been meeting under a total media blackout since 1954 (Jones 2006). This already violates the laws of several nations including the United States such as the Logan Act. This law is found in Title 18 in US Code of Federal Regulations, Sec 593. Because of the corruption that it breeds, all public officials who attend are guilty of felony crimes and can be punished with three years of incarceration.

As a result of the more overt and aggressive international policies, the late 1950’s through the 1960’s, experienced a more galvanized public resistance to internationalist corporate shenanigans and their interlocking globalist bureaucracies. In 1962, the American Legion passed a resolution condemning the CFR. The daughter of the American Revolution petitioned Congress to investigate them. The Goldwater movement, which was to restore the GOP to its roots, and the newly formed John Birch Society rose in strong opposition to the globalists and CFR (Perloff, 1988).

Even with pushback from these highly motivated groups and others, most people were still in the dark. This allowed corporate agents like John Perkins to move across the world and shakedown nations for trillions of dollars in the 1970’s and 1980’s. Recruited by the National Security Agency to be the Chief Economist for the Boston based Charles T. Main Inc., corporate skullduggery was the name of the game. To justify massive World Bank loans to developing countries, he produced an exaggerated false economic prospectus for infrastructure projects and skillfully sold it to his critics. After the loans were approved, contractors from outside the host nation would pour in to start massive water and power construction (Perkins, 2004).

The indigenous people did not benefit as a whole because no new jobs were created for them and they could not afford the services rendered if the projects were finished. By the time the bill came due for the interest on the loans, the leaders had been replaced. The pound of flesh required by these corporations, like Main, Bechtel, and Halliburton, would be to tax the people into submission and strip the land of coveted natural resources. Additionally, these developing nations would have to support US foreign policies and military presence. If a leader of a nation did not get with the corporate program, the “jackals” were right behind him to mop up. Jaime Roldos of Ecuador and Omar Torrijos of Panama were examples. If the leaders were too heavily guarded, or the CIA installed replacements developed hubris of their own then justification for military intervention of that nation would be waiting (Perkins, 2004).

Perkins, who coined the word “Corporatocracy” (Irvine, 2014), lays out how international corporations dominate the majority of the world’s nations in his New York Times bestselling autobiographical novel, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. A good Illustration of this concept from the time period was the film, Network. “There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and ITT and AT&T” the antagonist shares his vision with newscaster Mr. Beale. “One vast and ecumenical holding,” he describes, “in which all men will share a common stock” (Lumet, 1976).

The omnipresence of industry and arms merging with government was a key point in President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s 1961 farewell address. “In the counsels of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought the by the military industrial complex.” Eisenhower continued, “The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and persists.”

In a speech to the American Newspaper Publishers Association three months later, President John F. Kennedy also warned of a “vast and monolithic conspiracy” and added “The word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society.” Kennedy himself resisted the Federal Reserve by issuing Executive Order 11110, which introduced billions of dollars of silver and silver certificates into circulation, as competing currency against Federal Reserve Notes. He resisted the CIA when he fired its director, Allen Dulles, in the wake of the “Bay of Pigs” disaster. He resisted the CFR when he fired his Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Lyman L. Limnitzer, for the proposing terrorists against Americans as a pretext for war with Cuba in the declassified Northwoods Document. Kennedy opposed the military industrial complex by ordering all troops out of Vietnam by 1965 in National Security Action Memorandum (NSAM) 263.

Kennedy was publicly executed and his direction was subsequently reversed. Since then, the CFR has been that driving force of influence and misplaced power for decades in both the Democrat and Republican parties. Every Secretary of Defense, over forty United States UN ambassadors, many dominant news media figures, and every member of every presidential cabinet from that day in 1963 have been CFR (Perloff, 1988), even unto this day (Jones, 2009).

“They [globalists] weren’t able to do this [take over] because they had better products,” explains radio host Alex Jones, in his YouTube video, Full Spectrum Evil: The Secrets of Global Domination, “They were able to do it because they created, through fractional reserve banking here in the US, and similar systems worldwide, unlimited free credit for themselves which they then loan out to you at interest.” Jones includes, “They have the get out of jail free card” (Jones 2011).

This was demonstrated in by Inside Job, which is a documentary film about the sub-prime mortgage crisis and subsequent financial meltdown in 2008, costing investors and taxpayers trillions of dollars.  Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the French socialist and Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund in 2007, was asked about the Simon Johnson’s article in The Atlantic magazine. Johnson stated, “The economic and political power of the financial services industry has become so great that the policy-making has become prisoner to the financial oligarchy.” Strauss-Kahn admitted, “That is not wrong,” adding, “I think he puts too much emphasis on this” (Ferguson 2010).

The abuse of economics as a political weapon for corporate control continues. In Foreign Affairs magazine. Shinzo Abe, Japanese Prime Minister from 2006-2007, told Foreign Affairs magazine, the chief publication of CFR’s scholarly white papers, that he was going to use “Abenomics,” his own brand of economics that dumped 100 trillion yen of stimulus onto the Japanese market. “Abenomics” merges “Reaganomics” and “Clintonomics,” as a decisive tool for steering Japan into the international Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) treaty (Rose, 2013).

These endorsements by the Council on Foreign Relations of economic and political activities at home and abroad such as the TTP and the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) have culminated in blowback across the land. At a Conference in Seattle, prolific filmmaker and historian, G. Edward Griffin, described his organization, Freedom-Force International, as the Antithesis to the CFR because it is built on the model of individualism and not collectivism (Griffin, 2010).

TTP and TTIP affect the sovereignty of all nations involved. In America, it is being negotiated in secret. There is no congressional or legislative oversight worldwide for its 30,000 pages. Before being quietly released recently, five out of twenty nine chapters that have been leaked, not only can corporations ignore the laws of all nations altogether if the laws interfere with profits, they can sue governments for losses to their expected future gains through “Investor State Tribunals.” Massive sweeping legislation for, guns, climate, cybersecurity, income, pharmaceutical, vitamins & minerals, surveillance, and copyrights are known to be included. In June, after being denied access by the Obama Administration, Congress abdicated its constitutional oversight powers to give the president unlimited “Fast Track” authority to negotiate the terms with 500 corporate lobbyists in secret, even secret from Congress (McAdoo 2014).

This blatant disregard for transparency and congressional oversight has lit a fire into the online Anti-globalist community worldwide, especially in the United States. No longer are these individuals and groups limited to books, magazines, talk radio, and documentaries. The Anti-globalists have taken up arms on the Internet. Former twelve time Congressman and three time presidential candidate Ron Paul’s Campaign for Liberty, the Ron Paul Channel, his homeschooling curriculum, and Institute for Peace and Prosperity have resisted globalism with a softer, more palatable tone that is easily digestible to the public.

The fight against globalism in governments, banks, and corporations is not a phenomenon that is mutually exclusive to isolated pockets of a geographical area within the states; it is widespread throughout all regions of America. The John Birch Society operates from Wisconsin, Abbey Martin’s Media Roots Podcast is a spin off from her forceful Breaking the Set show on RT News is in Washington DC. Luke Rudkowski’s We Are Change (WRC) is home-ported in New York and has activists in every state. Mark Dice frequently wreaks havoc with his petitions in San Diego. Storm Clouds Gathering is a popular YouTube channel. The Jacksonville based Radio Show Earth: with Dr. Drake & Dr. Truth, is overtly Anti-New World Order in tone. Caravan to Midnight with John B. Wells and Truthstream Media with Aaron & Melissa Dykes are organizations in Texas, Crossing the Void Radio with Scott Haire is based in Connecticut, Dan Bidondi of the Rhode Island stationed Truth Radio Show single-handedly shut down three FBI conferences about the 2013 Boston bombings with questions about “false flag” operations.

Another prominent figure in the world of resistance is Lew Rockwell, the author of several books including the Economics of Freedom and The Left, The Right, and the State. He is a staunch anti-war, anti-state, “anarcho-capitalist,” and founder of the Ludwig von Mises Institute of Austrian Economic Studies in Auburn, Alabama. The Mises Institute is a central hub for liberty oriented scholars from around the world. Mises.org alone gets over half a million visitors per month. More media savvy activists include Constitutional lawyer Krissanne Hall from the Tallahassee based Krissanne Hall Show, who frequently travels the country on speaking tours. Decorated Marine and author of Freedom Adam Kokesh started out as the host of  RT’s Adam vs the Man. Author, actor, wrestler, US Navy Seal, and former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura hosts the hard core anti-establishment Off The Grid. Gerald Celente’s Trends Research Institute is harshly critical of globalist scandals. Joel Skoussen’s World Affairs Brief and Matt Drudge’s Drudge Report are also famous within the Anti-globalist community. These activists also share a common trait; they are primarily non-party affiliated.

Among these individuals and organizations, Alex Jones of Infowars.com is considered by many in Anti-globalist circles to be at the “tip of the spear” in the fight against what global leaders themselves call the “New World Order. Alex Jones’s Infowars.com and PrisonPlanet.tv have risen from a public access radio show in the late 1990’s in Austin, Texas to 9.9 million viewers per month according to Similarweb.com.

These groups have plenty to say about a great deal of issues across the geopolitical spectrum. The UN Global Biodiversity Assessment Agenda 21 is a good example because it has caused alarm in the alternative independent media community. Agenda 21 usurps federal and state authorities and goes directly into local communities. Adrian Whylie, a former Libertarian candidate for governor of Florida, warns of the “Florida Forever” program to confiscate private property under the guise of environmentalism and turning over wetlands to Nestle, a Swiss company, so they can bottle the water and sell it back to us (Irvine 2014). From lauding the virtues of bringing back gladiatorial events in a Hunger Games type of scenario, to cramming people into compact cities, fierce opposition to Agenda 21 is looming, After UN Secretary General Kofi Anon recommended humans eat bugs to save the planet, radio host Alex Jones talked about an anti-human agenda that wants people to live in a 200 square foot apartment and pay $100 for a steak (Jones 2006).

The Globalists can push back too, and play dirty. When the World Trade Organization (WTO) had a meeting in Seattle in 1999, thousands of people who criticized the organization as being a thinly veiled asset collection tool for elitists on the global plantation, showed up to protest. “What do you do when you have an angry crowd with a legitimate gripe? You call in your boys” according to documentary film Police State II: The Takeover. In the film, Anarchists known as the “Black Block,” under Delta Force protection, and a rent free a base of operations across from the Seattle Police station, injected themselves into the crowd of legitimate protesters. After hours of destructive behavior against the will of the majority, they created the pretext for the police to crack down on the entire crowd, beating and arresting them indiscriminately. The First Amendment was suspended, martial law was in effect, and sixty percent of the city was shut down while WTO meeting continued unabated. Anyone so much as wearing an Anti-WTO pin in downtown Seattle was arrested at the checkpoint (Jones 2001).

The advent of this internet activism has led to a mass awakening and also resulted in the establishment globalists counter-responding in other, more positive ways after decades of press and media denial and blackout, the Bilderberg Group now has an official website. Sometimes, even Congress responds, Rep Mike Rogers has even introduced HR 1205, the “American Sovereignty Restoration Act” to permanently end US membership in the United Nations (American 2015).

“Monopoly needs government,” G. Edward Griffin best explains while unmasking the paradox of the rich socialist: “The biggest industries today, the multinationals, are not interested so much in efficiency in production or competition in price or product level. They are competing at the government level,” adding, “so they can use the power structure of government to eliminate or hinder their competition” (Griffin 1975).

The progress that capitalism and corporate profits bring can certainly empower humanity or it can be an incredible engine for global tyranny. What will we choose for the future of international business?  Competitive goods and services or coercion? The consequences of inaction to the future of humanity can be severe. The battle rages on. What else can be done? Be Vigilant, conduct your own research, vote with your dollars, and be prepared.

Frederick Douglass stated, “A man’s liberties rest in three boxes, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.”

Works Cited

American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2015, H.R.1205, 114th Cong. (2015). Retrieved from

congress.gov database https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/1205/cosponsors

Butler, S. (1935, 2003). War is a Racket. Port Townsend, WA: Feral House.

Ferguson, C. (Director). (2010). Inside Job [Motion picture on DVD]. US: Sony Pictures.

Girls Count Act of 2015,  Public Law No: 114-24, 114th Cong. Retrieved from congress.gov


Griffin, G. (1975, August 16). The Politics of Cancer Therapy. Speech, Fullerton CA.

Griffin, G (1975, October 4). The Myth and Meaning of Monopoly Capitalism. Speech,

Hollywood, CA.

Griffin, G. (1994). The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second look at the Federal Reserve.

Westlake Village, CA: American Media.

Griffin, G. (2010, January 11). Crash Course on Money. Lecture, Seattle.

Irvine, S. (Producer). (2014, August 23). John Perkins: Confessions of an Economic Hitman

[Radiobroadcast]. In The Radio Show Earth. Jacksonville: Holsclaw. From


Irvine, S. (Producer). (2015, March 15). G. Edward Griffin: Individualism v Collectivism [Radio

broadcast]. In The Radio Show Earth. Jacksonville: Holsclaw. From


Jones, A. (Director). (2011). Full Spectrum Evil: Secrets of Global Domination [Motion picture].US: YouTube.

Jones, A. (Director). (2001). Police State II [Motion picture on DVD]. US: Infowars.

Jones, A. (Director). (2006). Endgame [Motion picture on DVD]. US: Infowars.

Jones, A. (Director). (2009). The Obama Deception [Motion picture on DVD]. US: Infowars.

Lumet, S. (Director). (1976). Network [Motion picture on DVD]. Canada: MGM/UA Warner.

McAdoo, L. (Producer). (2014). TPP: Fast Track to Facism [Motion picture]. US: Youtube.

McCormack / Dickstein Committee for Un American Activities to investigate Nazi Propaganda,

73rd- – 74th Cong, Retrieved from http://www.claytoncramer.com/primary/other/HUAC1.pdf

Mullins, E. (1991). Secrets of the Federal Reserve. Carson City: Bridger House Publisher.

Parfrey, A. (2003). Introduction. War is a Racket (pp. 7-1). Port Townsend, WA: Feral House.

Perloff, J. (1988). Shadows of Power: The Council on Foreign Relations and the American

            Decline. Appleton WI: Western Island Publishers.

Perloff, J. (2009, July 23). Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved October 18, 2015, from


Perkins, J. (2004). Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. San Francisco: First Plume Printing.

Rose, G. (Editor). (2013, July 1). Japan is Back: A Conversation with Shinzo Abe. Foreign           Affairs, 92-4. from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/interviews/2013-05-16/japan-back

Rothbard, M. (1996). Money, Banking, and the Federal Reserve [Motion picture on DVD]. US: Mises Institute.

Madison’s Challenge: “Systemic Vices” and the New Constitution

James Madison, by John Vanderlyn

James Madison, by John Vanderlyn (1816)

During the “Critical Period” following the birth of these United States after Revolutionary War, the Articles of Confederation were failing on multiple levels. America was falling apart and something had to be done quickly.

James Madison recognized the problem, did his homework, had a vision, and made a bold plan.

The principal historic events and key issues that led to the formation the American system of government are as fascinating and as spectacular as the Constitution itself.  With the foundation for a just government in America established by the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation attempted to unite the States to protect their mutual interests in commerce and defense. The weaknesses in the new system consequences of subsequent events highlighted the need for strengthening and amending the Articles.  Widely known as the “Architect of the Constitution”, the very capable James Madison was an instrumental force for handling this monumental task. As a scholarly master of public affairs, he organized a convention of delegates together at Philadelphia. He came prepared. As seemingly polished as the much celebrated final document is in outward appearance, which can be attributed in part to Madison’s well thought-out and articulated points, it was also the product of some truly remarkable fireworks in heated debates at the convention that directly reflected the tumultuous events of the “Critical Period”, and ultimately a testament to Madison’s leadership alongside the coordinated responses of an outstanding galaxy of brilliant men who conceived this new republic in the age of monarchies.

Drafted primarily by John Dickinson in 1776, and formally ratified in 1781 by all the States, The Articles of Confederation were principally a “league of friendship” between thirteen sovereign and independent states. The Articles featured a unicameral legislature, no executive or judicial branch, and a loose confederation of independent States, (More Perfect Union: Creation).  Each state was authorized two to seven representatives but only had only one vote The Congress could not tax the people directly or regulate trade. The Congress had to make formal requests to the states to raise troops or fund the treasury. Furthermore, Congress could appropriate and borrow money and handle foreign relations, but those powers were limited

As a consequence, James Madison saw the Articles as woefully inadequate because the United States could not tax directly, was impotent in setting or regulating commercial policy or settle disputes between the states. Additionally, there was no effective way to support a war effort. On the brink of economic disaster due to states printing and inflating their money supply, businesses were in a state of depression and farmers were losing their lands. The farmers in Massachusetts were in revolt and the state government had to put it down. Known as Shays’s Rebellion, the 1787 revolt exacerbated fears that anarchy was around the corner.  The delegate from Virginia, James Madison, had a rescue plan. (More Perfect Union: Creation).

This plan would not only amend the Articles of Confederation, it would amend them entirely out of existence (More Perfect Union: America). Later, in Madison’s tenth essay, he would explain his reasons. Article III contained a “general welfare” clause (Articles). Providing for the common defense and supporting the general welfare as enumerated in the Articles of Confederation, as justification for the departure and the establishment of a new constitution (Rossiter 259-260) and eventually the phrases were lifted directly from the Articles of Confederation and transplanted to the Constitution (Constitution).

The first step was already in progress and had taken place in 1785 as a meeting at George Washington’s Mount Vernon estate between delegates of Maryland and Virginia to foster alliances and commercial relations in spite of the Articles (McClanahan 143). The next year, when all the states were invited to a conference in Annapolis, Maryland, Madison and Hamilton made plans for a Philadelphia Convention. (144). Madison embarked on a scholarly research project that would run through 1787. Knowing of Madison’s prior accomplishments and service in Congress from 1780-1783, Georgia’s William Pierce added, “The affairs of the States, he perhaps, has the most correct knowledge of, of any man in the Union” (Gutzman 49).

James Madison’s deep research into the history of successful and failed federations added a whole new dimension to the debates which would manifest through some of his most profound writings and speeches. Together with Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, Madison contributed to a series of letters totaling eighty five, published in New York newspapers under the pseudonym Publius, known as the Federalist (Morris 13-15). These Federalist Papers shared a national vision and were lauded by Thomas Jefferson as an outstanding work of advocacy as, “the best commentary on the principles of government which was ever written” (19).

Continuing on the subject of Hamilton’s Letter known as Federalist # 15, titled “Insufficiency of the Present Confederacy to Preserve the Union” (Rossiter 100), Madison expounds on the same subject by citing Demosthenes account of the failures in ancient Greece of the Amphictyonic Council (118) as the center of power in the federation shifted from Athens for seventy-three years, to the Lacedaemonians for twenty-nine years, and ultimately to the Thebans after Battle of Leuctra (119). After war with Xerxes, the inefficiency of the union surfaced with the jealousy and ambition as the members grew more powerful while the less powerful members became more dependent and degraded (119). Athens and Sparta were inflated from victories and became rivals and bitter enemies and inflicted upon each other greater damage than they suffered under the Persians. Peloponnesian War resulted in ruin and slavery to the Athenians who had launched the war (120).

Madison laid out systematically what went wrong in Greece, noting that, historically, when governments are weak at home and have many dissensions, they are quick to foment external crises. Such was the case as strife between the Amphictyonic Council, aligned with the Thebans, brought charges against the Phocians who were aided by Athens and Sparta. When the Amphictyons invited Phillip of Macedonia to come to their aid, he quickly capitalized on the situation, which he secretly influenced from the beginning, to dominate and subjugate all parties involved. Indeed, inciting domestic insurrection was listed in the grievances against England, in the Declaration of Independence, as an effective tool for despotism (Declaration). Disharmony from the very onset, exacerbated by a divide-and-conquer strategy from a foreign infiltrator, in Madison’s view, prevented them from withstanding Macedonia and the imposition of the Romans and their vicissitudes (Rossiter 120).

Having much praise for the Achean League of Grecian republics for retaining their municipalities and equality, their ability to send ministers and ambassadors abroad, make treaties, alliances and war through their senate, and the establishment of praetors to command the armies and enforce the uniform laws, Madison lamented the inclusion of Lacedaemon to the league. Unwilling to bring their existing laws into conformity with the union they were joining allowed for the Macedonian arts of disruption to enter and destroy their entire Union (121).

Upon Arrival in Philadelphia, Madison outlined twelve “Vices of the Political System of the United States” (Gutzman 50-52). The vices were classified into two groups, addressing deficiencies of the state governments and the federal system itself. In his first four vices, Madison elaborated on the state issues, charging that they constantly failed to comply with Congress’s requisitions , frequently encroached upon the federal authority, performed “Violations of the Laws of nations and of treaties”, and committed infractions on each other’s rights.  In vice number five, the absence of interstate cooperation was highlighted and a lack of federal guarantee against anti-republican revolution in the states was expounded upon in his sixth (Gutzman 50-52).

The seventh, which was structural in nature, stated, a “want of sanction to the laws and coercion in the Government of the Confederation”. Madison argued that the Articles were not really a constitution without coercion when dealing with the issue of state non-compliance. Furthermore, his strong advocacy for popular ratification was reflected by the “want of ratification by the people of the Articles of Confederation” as listed in his eight vice. The ninth and tenth dealt with the “mutability” of an overwhelming influx in the number of state laws, making it difficult to impossible for citizens of other states and even residents to keep up, adversely impacting the economies of the individual states (53).

The eleventh vice was an entire essay dedicated to the “injustice of the Laws of the States”.  Madison laid out his theory concerning why bad men are elected to office and surmises the pool of candidates in smaller spheres may be found wanting.  Three motives for political aspiration in three categories, ambition, personal interest, and the public good, are presented.   As an argument against mob rule in a republic, he stated that the people acting unjustly is more damaging to a republic than legislative misconduct (53). Continuing Hamilton’s argument for a Union as a safeguard against domestic faction and insurrection as outlined in Federalist # 9, Madison writes about the differences between democracies and republics in Federalist # 10, claiming that a republican “extension of the sphere” is the best cure for the ailments of the confederacy and protects minorities from the greed and passion of the majority because factions are unavoidable and means should be taken to minimize their effects (Rossiter 77-79).

In his final “Vices” expressed the desirability of an electoral process that would promote the most capable people to obtain office as they were honorably impelled to public service for the public good.

In a letter to George Washington, an outspoken critic of the Articles of Confederation, James Madison worked very hard to lay out the Virginia Plan and persuade Washington to come to the Philadelphia Convention (Ketchum 31). Madison also coached Edmund Randolph prior to the event and prompted to submit the Virginia Plan which was drafted mostly with his vision, before others could submit their plans on the floor.  Originally sold as to be “corrected and enlarged”, this bold plan shocked Randolph, as it was set not only to be a departure from the Articles, but to scrap them entirely (Morris 219).  The Virginia Plan featured a national Executive to enforce the laws with veto powers to be chosen by congress and serve seven years, a judicial branch with a system of federal courts, and popular vote for representatives (224).

The Virginia Plan drew fierce opposition from Roger Sherman of Connecticut and Elbridge Gerry took an anti-democratic position warned that republicans should remember “the dangers of a leveling spirit” bringing the issue of classes into the debate (224) while George Mason warned of working to avoid too much democracy would go too far in the other direction (224). James Wilson wanted to “raise the federal pyramid as high as possible” which would require a widest possible base. John Dickenson argued that the states would be devoured by the national government. Fierce debate over the selection process for senators ensued. Dickenson won (227) Senators to be chosen by state legislators. Opposition by William Paterson of New Jersey claiming “We have no power to go beyond the federal scheme” as outlined in the Articles of Confederation (Morris 228).

During the Conference, a rule of absolute secrecy was in effect which Jefferson confessed to Adams as being “abominable” in his opinion. Madison revealed, “no Constitution would ever had been adopted by the convention had the debates been public” (Morris 221-222).

The convention was not smooth sailing for Madison. He spoke almost every day during the Convention to defend practically every alteration or correction to his original plan and often found himself at odds with the more conservative elements in the Convention. Outright fierce opposition to the Constitution as a whole was in full-swing by members such as George Mason and Edmund Randolph of Virginia and Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, who declared their intention not to sign the document. Mason declared the Vice-Presidency as an infringement to the Senate and the Executive as downright dangerous (Ketchum 171). His notes were not published until after his death, notes which he confessed in life to their meticulous undertaking almost killing him (Morris 210). Madison wrights of his research project:

The curiosity I had felt during my researches into the History of the most distinguished Confederacies, particularly those of antiquity, and the deficiency I found in the means of satisfying it more especially in what related to the process, the principles, the reasons, & the anticipations, which prevailed in the formation of them, determined me to preserve as far as I could an exact account of what might pass in the Convention whilst executing its trust, with the magnitude of which I was duly impressed, as I was with the gratification promised to future curiosity by an authentic exhibition of the objects, the opinions & the reasoning’s from which the new System of Govt was to receive its peculiar structure & organization. Nor was I unaware of the value of such a contribution to the fund of of materials for the History of a Constitution on which would be staked the happiness of a people great even in its infancy, and possibly the cause of Liberty through the world. (Madison)

In spite of heated debates on Representation, Executive Power, Executive Salaries, electing Representatives and Senators, veto of state laws, the nature of federalism, judiciary, separation of powers, State equality in the Senate, majority rule and basic republican principles, lengths of terms for senators, citizenship, immigration, appointment of judges, the practice of slavery, qualifications for suffrage, the New Jersey Plan, and Hamilton’s National Plan, James Madison’s Virginia plan endured with some important changes (McClanahan 145).

In the end Mr. Madison was overruled for many of his arguments, however, he was successful in getting a simple majority vote for the regulation of interstate commerce through a successful argument. Slavery concessions were made. More often than not Madison was disappointed at the direction of the Convention and in many respects he was forced to openly support a document he had not envisioned in the beginning of the conference. History shows that Madison would convert and become a leader within the Anti-Federalists. To his continued credit, he did keep his word and work to install a Bill of Rights into the Constitution after it was ratified.

Additionally, by personally and repeatedly calling on prominent figures like George Washington to preside over the Convention , Madison demonstrated keen political insight while giving credit to all that were present for the contents of the end product. Thanks to his vision and tireless efforts, persistence through planning, coordination with like-minded individuals to publish numerous essays, conducting extensive research, coaching key delegates, and enduring the firestorm of harsh criticism and debate until the end, James Madison will be seen as a public benefactor for Americans throughout the ages as an essential Founding Father and the true “Architect of the Constitution”.

Works Cited

A More Perfect Union: The Creation of the US Constitution. National Archives and Records Administration. Web. 28 Jan. 2014.

A More Perfect Union: America Becomes a Nation. Dir. Peter M. Johnson. Perf. Craig Wasson, Michael Mcquire, and Fredd Wayne. .Bridgestone Media Group,1989. DVD.

The Articles of Confederation: A Transcription. National Archives and Records Administration. Web. 24 Feb. 2014.

Anti-Federalist Papers: and the Constitutional Convention Debates. Ed. Ralph Ketcham. Signet Classic, 2003. Print.

The Constitution of the United States: A Transcription. National Archives and Records Administration. Web. 24 Feb. 2014.

The Declaration of Independence for the United States of America: A Transcription. National Archives and Records Administration. Web. 24 Feb. 2014.

Federalist Papers. Ed. Clinton Rossiter. Signet Classic, 2003. Print.

Gutzman, Kevin R C. James Madison and the Making of America. New York: St Martin’s Press, 2012. Print.

Madison, James. “Preface to Debates in the Convention” Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention: Teachingamericanhistory.org. Ashbrook Center, 2006. Web. 14 Apr. 2014.

McClanahan, Brion. Politically Incorrect Guide to The Founding Fathers. New York: Perseus Distribution, 2009. Print.

Morris, Richard B. Witnesses at the Creation: Hamilton, Madison, Jay and the Constitution. Ontario: Penguin, 1985. Print.


Dangerous Lessons: The “Melian Dialogue” for the Modern Age

Melian Dialogue, blogs.scientificamerican.com/

Melian Dialogue, blogs.scientificamerican.com/

When the Athenian General Thucydides recorded the History of the Peloponnesian War, did he know that his writings would stand the test of time through the millennia and that the dialogues contained within would remain as profound barometers for measuring the human condition?  One such discourse is known as the “Melian Dialogue”, between neutral people on the island of Melos and their would-be Athenian conquerors.  Many themes run throughout this very candid and insightful conversation between the key decision makers of the day that continue to have a profound impact in modern society including the justification for imperial hubris, the role of power in the defense of freedom, the sustainment of empires through force and fear, the doctrine of blowback, the willing consent of the governed, and speaking truth to power regardless of the potential ramifications.

The Melians were a colony from Sparta wmelian-debateho refused to join the Athenian empire like other islanders had done, instead preferring to remain neutral in the forthcoming conflict between Athens and Sparta. Before physical hostilities ensued, Athens sent representatives to negotiate, declaring that they wanted no trouble in bringing them into the empire for the good of both peoples. The Melians countered their claims with hope in the Spartans coming to their aid and faith that the gods would protect them, as they have survived for hundreds of years as a society. The Athenians began to extol the virtues of their invasion by claiming:

Our opinion of the gods and our knowledge of men lead us to conclude that it is a general and necessary law of nature to rule what we can. This is not a law we made ourselves, nor were we the first to act upon it when it was made. We found it already in existence, and we shall leave it to exist for ever for those who come after us. We are merely acting in accordance with it and we know that anyone else with the same power as ours would act in precisely the same way. (Thucydides 405)

The ideas discussed would be applied throughout the generations. One example takes place in the late eighteenth century while Adam Smith was in England drafting The Wealth of Nations and the founding fathers in America were contemplating independence. At a time when the ideas and language of liberty was flourishing a much more nefarious course for humankind was also being hatched elsewhere in Europe (Declaration).

SecretsIn 1983, Eustace Mullins published Secrets of the Federal Reserve in which he gives credit to William Guy Carr, writer of Pawns In The Game, who revealed a meeting of bankers in Mayer Amschel Bauer’s Goldsmith Shop in Frankfurt in 1773. Bauer, who would later be known to the world as “Rothschild” or Red Shield, invited twelve other wealthy and influential men to convince them that if they agreed to pool their resources they could then finance and control the World Revolutionary Movement and use it as their Manual of Action to win ultimate control of the wealth, natural resources, and manpower of the entire world. Reasoning that it was logical to conclude that the in laws of nature right lies in force and that political freedom is an idea, not a fact, he added that the use of any and all means to reach their final goal was justified on the grounds that the ruler who governed by the moral code was not a skilled politician because he left himself vulnerable and in an unstable position, asserting that right lies in force. He stated that the word Right is an abstract thought and proves nothing, finding a new right to attack by the Right of the Strong. They had the right to seize property by any means, and without hesitation, securing submission and sovereignty (Mullins 55).

Likewise, the Athenians were frustrated with the Melians and charged that they have proven nothing and through a false sense of honor will fall into disaster for the sake of an idea (Thucydides 205). With straightforward candor, the Athenians brashly justify imposing their will in the name of their own interests by saying, “So that by conquering you we shall increase not only our size but the security of the empire” (Thucydides 403).

ChessboardIn 1997, top globalist strategist Zbigniew Brzezinski, founder and former head of the NSA and Trilateral Commission, wrote a book about maintaining American primacy and global hegemony called the Grand Chessboard, in which he establishes its purpose.  Brzezinski states, “It is imperative that no Eurasian challenger emerges, capable of dominating Eurasia and thus also challenging America.”  Justification for territorial expansion remains a perpetual phenomenon.

Tragedy and HopeThe Athenians also understood very well the importance that power plays in the defense of freedom, responding to the Melians with, “So far as right and wrong are concerned they think that there is no difference between the two, that those who preserve their independence do so because they are strong, and that if we fail to attack them it is because we are afraid” (Thucydides 403).  They later add, “Hope is a comforter in Danger! If one already has solid advantages to fall back upon, one can indulge in hope.” Carrol Quigley, Professor of history at Georgetown University and mentor or Bill Clinton, wrote in 1966, “While politics consists of much more than weapons, the nature, organization, and control of weapons is the most significant of the numerous factor that determines what happens in political life (Clinton).” He goes on to say:

When weapons are of the “amateur” type of 1880, as they were in Greece in the fifth century B.C., they are widely possessed by citizens, power is similarly dispersed, and no minority can compel the majority to yield to its will. With such an “amateur weapons system” (if other conditions are not totally unfavorable), we are likely to find majority rule and a relatively democratic political system. (Quigley 1200)

When citing unfavorable conditions, Quigley was alluding to armed citizens as a fundamental problem to elitist command-and-controllers in their efforts to maintain control over their vassal populations.

To maintain an empire, the professor continues:

But, on the contrary, when a period can be dominated by complex and expensive weapons that only a few persons can afford to possess or can learn to use, we have a situation where the minority who control such” specialist” weapons can dominate the majority who lack them. In such a society, sooner or later, an authoritarian political system that reflects the inequality in control of weapons will be established. (Quigley 1202)

The Athenians were less mindful of mainland inhabitants who were free because their level of comfort made them slow to mobilize their forces, also claiming “We are more concerned about islanders like yourselves, who are still not subdued or subjects who have become embittered by the constraint that empire imposes upon them. These are the people most likely to act in a reckless manner and bring themselves and us, too, into the most obvious danger.” (Thucydides 403)  Mr. Rothschild expounds on this principle at infamous meeting by outlining in his master plan, by using all outlets of public information which they own and control to invent infamies that would bring others into disrepute, who if left unchecked would interfere with their overall plans (Mullins 55).

Niccolò Machiavelli, oil painting by Santi di Tito

Niccolò Machiavelli, oil painting by Santi di Tito

Fear based systems of domination and control are crucial element to maintaining empires. The Athenians do promise, perhaps disingenuously, that Melians can keep their property as long as they pay tribute to them and they continue to use the island as a strategic location for furthering of the empire (Thucydides 406). This strategy, commended by fifteenth century author Niccolo Machiavelli while crediting to the Romans for using it, was lauded, “Sending out colonies to for as strategic locations to maintain control of other nearby lands at little expense to the ruler…All others left unmolested, are in consequence easily quieted, and at the same time afraid to make a false move, less they share the fate of those who have been deprived of their possessions.” (Machiavelli 39) Superior firepower alone is not enough to dominate subjects. Fear based systems of control must also be implemented. Framing the debate by dictating the terms from the beginning with the prerequisite of elimination of arguments pertaining to justice that would otherwise be given, has also proven to be an effective measure of control that the Melians would have to overcome in this debate (Thucydides 401).

51LHOdCZZUL._SX326_BO1,204,203,200_Blowback is also known as the law of unintended consequences.  One of the more outrageous examples this doctrine is cited by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) concerning the US intrusive and internationalist foreign policy in Iran. An excerpt from the Stephen Kinzer book titled appears twice on the official CIA.gov website and reads, “It is not far-fetched to draw a line from Operation Ajax through the Shah’s repressive regime and the Islamic revolution to the fireballs that engulfed the World Trade Center in New York.” (Kinzer 202-204) The book continues to make the point that the world has paid a heavy price for Western activity in the Middle East (205). In the same spirit, the Melians address this issue to the Athenians by saying:

Is it not certain that you will make enemies of all the states who are at present neutral and naturally conclude that you will attack them too? Does this not mean you are strengthening your enemies you have already and forcing others to become your enemies against their intentions and inclinations?” (Thucydides 403)

One example of efforts to prevent blowback is James Buchanan’s decision not invade South Carolina during his presidency. In December of 1860, by the process of rescinding their original ratification of the Constitution of 1788 through the state legislature, South Carolina seceded from the Union. Fear of encouraging other states to follow suit and thus destroying the rest of the Union led to a special committee and Jefferson Davis was dispatched to negotiate terms for South Carolina’s return (McClanahan).

The consent of the governed has manifested as a vital component to the endurance of any system ranging from benevolent cooperation to authoritative control through the ages.

Indeed, the very language in Declaration of Independence for the United States inspired by John Locke and penned by Thomas Jefferson overtly proclaims, “To secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just power from the consent of the governed” (Declaration).  “ In 2008, Brezezinski, acting as a top Obama Administration foreign policy advisor, frustrated over a mass political awakening because of influences such as the internet, lamented, “In earlier times it was literally easier to control a million people than to physically kill a million people, today it is infinitely easier to kill a million people than to control one million people” (Brezezinski speech).  Recognizing that the consent is a necessary and universal ingredient to any prolonged period of base domination, more sophisticated methods would have to be developed to usurp this unchanging requirement. Some elitists like Edward Bernays, the revered Father of Modern Advertising, Propaganda, and the nephew of Sigmund Freud, was intimately familiar with the effective use of applied psychology. Where consent does not exist, it was necessary to manufacture it.  In his 1928 book, Propaganda, he opens with:

The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. (Bernays 37)

Rothschild understood the role of consent when he spoke of his plans to “reconstruct all existing institutions, and to become the sovereign Lord of all those who left to us the rights to their powers by laying them down to us in their liberalism” (Mullins 55).

Etienne De La Boetie

Etienne De La Boetie in 1559

Etienne De La Boetie, who wrote a Discourse of Voluntary Servitude, counters Machiavelli’s techniques with the notion that a tyrant is automatically defeated if the country consent to their own enslavement (De La Boetie 44). Speaking truth to power in boldness as an open display of dissent was even integrated into Greek literature. In Sophocles Theban play, Antigone, Creon the king declares disobedience and anarchy as the worst of all evils and the greatest crime on the earth while Antigone challenges him, ready to face death unashamed  (Sophocles 84-85; 94).

The Melians were bold enough to speak truth to power toward the Athenians, who were equally as likely to be familiar with the concept of non-compliance described in Antigone, and withdraw their consent (84-85). The concluded the negotiations with “Our decision Athenians is just the same as it was at first. We are not prepared to give up in a short moment the liberty which our city has enjoyed from its foundation for 700 years” (Thucydides 407).  In recent times, the nations of the world have received open threats in the style and spirit of the Dialogue from the likes of globalist operative Henry Kissinger, commanding,  “We will have a New World Order whether we like it or not either by conquest or consent” (Endgame). This is just one example of a history that is replete with ultimatums similar to that in the Melian exchange.

As the history of human condition and traditions unfolds, for those who endeavor to understand continuous struggle between freedom oriented people and tyrannical forces that would enslave them, the “Melian Dialogue” and the magnitude of its implications and applications must not be overlooked. It serves a damning indictment of the imperial hubris inherent within our species while simultaneously accounting for the hope of a more satisfactory state of affairs through resistance to tyranny in the face of seemingly insurmountable odds.

Works Cited

Bernays, Edward. Propaganda. New York: Ig Publishing.2005. Print. A1928 book that openly

crows about the elites and their enslaved masses through psychological manipulation.

Brzezizinski, Zbigniew, The Grand Chessboard. New York. Basic Books. 1997. Print.

—. “Global Political Awakening”. Montreal. Council on Foreign Relations. 17 Nov. 2008. Speech. A top New World Order strategist lays out plans for American global hegemony.

Clinton, William J. Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Democratic National Convention. New York .1992. Speech. Bill Clinton accept the nomination shares his appreciation for his Georgetown University Professor Carrol Quigley.

De le Boete, Ettiene. Politics of obedience: The discourse of voluntary servitude. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute. 2008. Print. A 1559 essay on how to neutralize tyrants.

The Declaration of Independence: A Transcription. National Archives and Records

Administration. Web. 24 Feb. 2014. The document that founded America.

Endgame: Blueprint for Global Enslavement. Free Speech Systems Inc. 2007.DVD. A documentary that serves as damning indictment of the globalists in their own words.

Kinzer, Stephen. All the Shah’s Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.2008. Print. An amazing historical book that reveals the folly of United States intervention in Iran referred to  by the CIA on their website.

Machiavelli, Nicollo. The Prince. Ed. Dover Thrift. New York. Dover Publications. 1992. Print. A book by a 15th Century thug, instructing his masters on how to control populations.

McClanahan, Brion. Cecession Part 1:The Election of 1860. 2013. MP4. An amazing video in which the professor brilliantly articulates the key events in a landmark election.

Mullins, Eustace. Secrets of the Federal Reserve. Carson City. Bridger House.1983. Print. The only book to ever be banned and burned in post Nazi WWII Germany.

Quigley, Carroll, “The Unfolding of Time.” Tragedy & Hope. San Pedro:GSG & Associates.1998. Print. The Rosetta Stone book for decoding what the elite criminals have been doing to the world for decades.

Sophocles. “Antigone”. The Tree Thebian Plays. Penguin: New York. 1984. Print.  A book with a series of plays, dealing mostly with the struggle of the species, man vs. the state.

Thucydides. History of the Peloponnesian War. Ed. Betty Radice, London. Penguin. 1972. Print.

An epic book with an amazing account of the first 2/3 of the Peloponnesian Wars.

United States Central Intelligence Agency. All the Shah’s Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror. Web. 24 Jan. 2014. An In-your-face web account of the consequences of  Operation Ajax and a rare admission of being responsible for 9/11.

Post 9/11 Treatment of Privacy and other “unlisted” Rights by Media

An episode of Law & Order featured the late active U.S. Senator Fred Thompson, who plays a high powered attorney with Supreme Court aspirations, explains what he calls the “Myth of Privacy.” Pointing to a framed parchment of the US Constitution on the wall, he informs his detective friends how privacy does not exist because it is not listed. This bold statement of ignorance was more than just bad acting according to an intentionally disingenuous and poorly written script; this act of deception, whether known or unknown by the actor, was also a violation of his real life oath. The oath was to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic while bearing true faith and allegiance to the same.

The Ninth Amendment states: The enumeration of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.


The Ninth Amendment is clearly a catch-all for all other rights not listed, including the right to privacy. In addition to the three federal crimes listed in the main body of the supreme law of the land, this amendment also makes it a crime for agents of the federal government to even speak disparagingly about any of the rights of the people.

While Thomson is correct in his assertion the word, privacy, does not exist in the document, he completely ignores two massive points. The first being the Ninth Amendment, and the second point is that privacy itself is that the Fourth Amendment states the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects shall not be violated; this is the very definition of privacy. No counter arguments were made from an intelligent viewpoint. Privacy rights advocates in the cast were only reflected by unsubstantiated emotional responses which ultimately conceded to the psychological warfare usurpation buzz term “9/11.” Any character that supported privacy sadly admitted that it was gone after the terrorist attacks.

I have yet to see any adequate representation of people who make valid constitutional arguments against the post 9/11 infringement of rights on popular Television. Furthermore,  Strict Constructionists of the Constitution, Christians, Patriots, Veterans, Libertarians, Sovereign Citizens, Austrian Economists, Investigative Reporters, Architects, Engineers, and even Anti-Authoritarian Atheists who do not buy the official story of 9/11 have virtually no representation in television and movie media.

This is consistent with the declassified CIA document 1035-960 which was drafted in 1967. This document was sent to the Psychological Warfare division and laments how most Americans were not buying the official story of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy as represented in the Warren Commission Report.  In the CIA document, they call upon their assets in government in media to demonize these people with the newly formulated weaponized term of “Conspiracy Theorists.” As a result of “Operation Mockingbird,” the demonization continues. Like the 1997 film Conspiracy Theory, featuring Mel Gibson & Julia Roberts, people who challenge establishment official stories or have a strong anti-authoritarian people are depicted as crazy, kooks, mentally ill or intellectually inferior.