Just prior to one of the biggest political upset in American history, I had an opportunity to talk with Alex Newman from the New American Magazine. The purpose of the interview was to determine if the black vote is as homogeneous as people are led to believe. In the article, published on November 5, just 3 days prior to election day, I break down why I did not support the Clinton campaign and even articulated my concerns for a Trump presidency as it relates to Constitutional issues.
Soros made billions over several decades by manipulating the dollar market and manufacturing economic collapses to make a profit. He is responsible for shorting the Pound in England and nearly imploding the country’s economic system in 1992 along with destroying the Malaysian and Indonesian economies in 1998. Soros also used his personal hedge fund to benefit from the 2008 market crash by executing pre-planned money movements and short selling during the onset of the crisis.
The 85-year-old Hungarian-American is a a major proponent of the one world government, one world currency, plutocratic framework which advocates for the complete eradication of borders.
In addition, Soros is responsible for funding various divide and conquer groups including Black Lives Matter, a Marxist cult used to drive a wedge between the races in America and distract the public from fighting back against the evils of globalism. If there’s a left-wing “progressive” hate group stirring up civil unrest, it’s likely Soros-funded.
Soros is a Nazi collaborator who aided in confiscating property from Jews and rounding up over 500,000 of them, many of whom were his friends and family, to send them to die in gas chambers. When recollecting these events the billionaire anti-capitalist often refers to his Nazi past as “the happiest time of my life.”
With that in mind, take a look at 8 U.S. Code 1182:
Section (E) explicitly states that “participants in Nazi persecution, genocide or the commission of any act of torture or extrajudicial killing” should be barred from entering the United States. Part (IV) of the document outlines that anyone associated with the government of a German ally (Hungary) who “assisted, or otherwise participated in the persecution of any person because of race, religion, national origin, or political opinion is inadmissible.”
Soros, a known Nazi collaborator, should therefore be banned from America.
The Code of Laws of the United States of America is a compilation of official federal statutes – the many rules and regulations outlined in the document regarding naturalization and citizenship are perfectly constitutional in accordance to Section 5 of the 14th Amendment:
“The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.”
Article 1 Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution states that Congress has the right to “establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States.”
The Constitution is a basic framework for the law but it is up to representatives in Congress to pass legislation aimed at clarifying the law as they relate to our basic rights and freedoms.
According to U.S. Code, the Constitution and the law it is glaringly obvious that globalist, Clinton-donor and Nazi collaborator George Soros should be permanently banned from the United States effective immediately.
The attempt by the United States to overthrow the Assad regime in Syria has recently manifested itself as an alliance between Google, the State Department, and the Qatar-based news agency known as Al Jazeera. Adding to the ongoing scandal surrounding the Hillary Clinton emails, the deliberate use of media to alter the citizenship of people in other countries for political reasons has come into the limelight (Bolton, 2016). This email was originally published on Jan. 7, 2016 by WikiLeaks, an online community of citizen activists who counter corporate and political establishments worldwide.
Jared Cohen, a former State Department official and a founding head of Google Ideas, sent a message in 2012 to the Deputy Secretary Burns. Cohen wrote about creating an app to track the defections in Syria in an effort to encourage more to defect. Partnering with Al Jazeera to give them primary ownership of the app, Cohen requested that the State Department keep it quiet. In the chain of messages, then Secretary of State Clinton replies to her Deputy Chief of Staff Sullivan with, “FYI – this is a pretty cool idea” (WikiLeaks, 2016).
Believing that this would have a powerful psychological impact as stated in the original letter, the plan went forward. Google created the app and gave it to Al Jazeera and they placed the interactive map on their website. Al Jazeera won the Best Technical Innovation Award at the Online Media Awards in London and even boasted about the award with four commendations on its website, the very tool that Google created (Chichakyan, 2016).
This underscores mainstream media willingness to cooperate with governments in the advancement of political agendas, thus blurring the lines between the organizations, while posing as independents in a plan to affect citizenship abroad against their governments. It was citizens who used internet to illustrate this collaboration and demonstrate that the power of the new media in the struggles for 21st century hegemony can work in both directions (Pieterse, 2012).
To Qatari citizens, Al Jazeera, which is chiefly on television and focuses primarily on international news, is a source of national pride. This has not stopped the trend that is shifting toward the internet as a primary source of news, especially in the ex-patriot resident population (Meeds, 2015).
Accompanying the growth of the internet as a news source is a substantial rise of internet activism such as blogging, trolling, and even a style of hacking called hacktivism as in the case for WikiLeaks (Cammaerts, 2013). Sometimes WikiLeaks are at odds with major news agencies and sometimes they work along-side (Roberts, 2011). In the past, WikiLeaks and Al Jazeera performed in a role together in de-legitimizing the Egyptian government in 2011 during what is dubbed Arab Spring. It is also important not to forget the significant role of social media by bringing together many anti-Mubarak forces who opposed the Egyptian president, coalescing them around several issues in their anti-regime platforms through Facebook and Twitter (Mabon, 2013). Also noteworthy in the struggle for dominance of the message on the web is the response of young people to the question of whether they approved of politicians also using social media such as Facebook and Twitter. Most were surprisingly in favor of it (Loader, 2016).
Hacktivists are usually united for a political cause that revolves around the free flow of information. According to the Hacktivismo Declaration, published on July 4, 2001 “State-sponsored censorship of the Internet is a serious form of organized and systematic violence against citizens.” (McCormick, 2013). The phenomenon of WikiLeaks is characterized by a variety of coordinated and talented group of people with weak and strong ties. They have a unique set of opportunities and constraints, with strategies of contention carried out by their members and sympathizers (Cammaerts, 2013).
WikiLeaks history against the US State Department, the leaks by Edward Snowden from the National Security Agency (NSA), the conviction of Bradley Manning, and the greater number of prosecutions by the Obama administration have caused a reconsideration of the significance of the case of the Pentagon Papers (Altschuler, 2015).
In considering the long term impact of citizen activism, the action is in the reaction. Large organizations and governing bodies usually do not respond to embarrassment with more openness. According to John McCarthy of the Australian Institute of International Affairs, “WikiLeaks’ long-term importance will not lie in the details it has revealed. These will prove ephemeral. It lies rather in the reactions to WikiLeaks in western democracies and what this shows about the difference between community thinking and official practice.” Citizen activism through releasing massive amounts of data in trying to bring bureaucratic systems in line with modern public attitudes faces a difficult challenge: Meaningful change without an overall shift of attitude within the organizations will be unrealistic (McCarthy, 2011).
Another case made against the effectiveness of WikiLeaks as a force for significant change or a threat to government secrecy is mathematical in nature. Massive leaks of news are not significant proportionate to the exponential growth in data used by governments in the information age. For example: Only six percent of the 250,000 US State Department leaks were considered classified Secret, and the State Department claims that it has moved 2.5 million documents, ten times that amount, by other means than the network that was hacked (Roberts, 2011).
Furthermore, the economic factors have come into play. PayPal, Amazon.com, Master Card, and Visa, have with withdrawn their support for WikiLeaks. No political pressure, which did exist, was required. They have cited violations of their online user agreements as reasons for the disassociation and cessation of services; however, the legal and financial risks outweighed the benefits to them as WikiLeaks was never a source of revenue for them. The benefits of cooperation were not sufficient for the risks (Roberts, 2011).
Another challenge to hacktivists comes from the moral question in the use of Distributed denial of service (DDOS), which shuts down an opponent’s web site, is a popular revenge tool in the arsenal of hackers on all sides of conflicts (Hampson, 2012). DDOS is a controversial contradiction within the hacktivism community because of the moral dilemma of preventing others from posting information is a violation of the very principles of the free flow of information they claim to stand for (Roberts, 2011).
Citizens who play an essential role in the new media as both consumers and online producers of information motivated to bring global changes through release of massive levels of guarded information may be marginally efficacious at best in affecting public policy, yet there is hope. Even Slavoj Zizek, a Marxist philosopher and professor at the European Graduate School in Slovenia has stated, “We can no longer pretend we don’t know what everyone knows we know” (Pieterse, 2012). In this way, hacktivists have already forced a change in corporate, mainstream traditional media, and government official narratives which are then subsequently re-consumed in the news cycle.
The dance between citizens and media as cooperative and opposing forces continues to be a spectacle of epic proportions; like two supermassive black holes spiraling toward each other at increasing speeds, with their colossal gravitational influences counter-balancing the other while spinning wildly toward a collision course, they release tremendous shock waves of super-heated gas and energy that ripples through the host galaxy. What happens when an unstoppable force comes into contact with an immovable object? What will be the long term effects of these ripples on society at large?
Altschuler, B. E. (2015). Is the Pentagon Papers Case Relevant in the Age of WikiLeaks?. Political Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell), 130(3), 401-423
Bolton, D. (2016, March 22). The Independent | News | UK and Worldwide News | Newspaper. Google planned to help Syrian rebels bring down Assad regime, leaked Hillary Clinton emails claim | News | Lifestyle | The Independent. Retrieved April 10, 2016, from http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/google-syria-rebels-defection-hillary-clinton-emails-wikileaks-a6946121.html
Cammaerts, B. (2013). Networked Resistance: The Case of WikiLeaks. Journal Of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(4), 420-436. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12024
Chichakyan, G. (2016, March 26). WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks – Hillary Clinton Email Archive. Retrieved March 27, 2016, from http://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/12166#efmAMoAbj
Hampson, N. N. (2012). HACKTIVISM: A NEW BREED OF PROTEST IN A NETWORKED WORLD. Boston College International & Comparative Law Review, 35(2), 511-542.
Mabon, S. (2013). Aiding Revolution? Wikileaks, communication and the ‘Arab Spring’ in Egypt. Third World Quarterly, 34(10), 1843-1857.
McCarthy, J. (2011). WikiLeaks [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]. Ethos, 19(2), 13-17.
McCormick, T. (2013). ANTHROPOLOGY OF AN IDEA HACKTIVISM. Foreign Policy, (200), 24-25. Retrieved from http://db08.linccweb.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1365771233?accountid=45782
Meeds, R. (2015). Changing roles of traditional and online media as trusted news sources in Qatar and their relationships with perceived important issues and interest in politics. Journal of Middle East Media Vol 11, Fall 2015
Pieterse, J. N. (2012). Leaking Superpower: WikiLeaks and the contradictions of democracy. Third World Quarterly, 33(10), 1909-1924.
Roberts, A. (2011). The WikiLeaks Illusion. Wilson Quarterly, 35(3), 16-21.
Listen for epic round-table discussion on Trump’s VP pick, secret 28 pages on 9/11, Islamic terror attack, Turkey coup and more.
This is perhaps the biggest and best edition of The Maverick Live yet, it’s the one year anniversary special featuring an epic all-star round-table discussion!
In segment one, host and Trump campaign contributor Benjamin Knight breaks down the war on police and what the New World Order end goal is with regard to the implementation of a U.N. peace keeping force. Then, a warning on the potential for civil unrest and a global collapse with four crises in particular that could be on the horizon. Finally, a quick recap of the RNC thus far and what Donald Trump’s ascendancy means for the Republican party.
The all-star panel talks Donald Trump’s VP pick, the latest terrorist attack in France, the Turkey coup, thoughts on the release of the 28 redacted pages of a joint 9/11 Inquiry Report, what this year’s RNC truly means, and more.
Benjamin Knight, the founder of We the Vigilant, was born in Engelwood, New Jersey and is a freelance writer currently pursuing a degree in communications with a focus on journalism. He is a constitutional conservative who is an unabashed nationalist pro-gun, pro-freedom, pro-America advocate. Knight has published over 500 articles and hosts the website’s flagship podcast, The Maverick LIVE, each and every Wednesday night at 8PM ET/7PM CT on WetheVigilant.com
As a completely unabashed Constitutionalist, this Washington State Representative is a local champion of individual liberty.
In this epic interview, Shae discusses his military service and political awakening. He also breaks down what it means to support and defend freedom without selling out.
Learn the secrets of presidential candidates that are hidden in plain sight and discover strategies of how we can overcome foreign and domestic threats ranging from sovereignty destroying trade deals to predatory sheriffs who target the citizens.
As an unexpected bonus, Rep. Shea also gives us inside information on the Oregon standoff and drops worldwide breaking exclusive news coverage in real-time concerning the death of Lavoy Finicum at the hands of the federal government.
Jesse Ventura is a world recognized public figure whose career spans over forty years. He is a former Navy Seal, actor, professional wrestler, New York Times Bestselling Author, alternative media personality, documentary television series host, mayor, and Governor of the State of Minnesota.
Kris Kyle, the legendary sniper who achieved world fame through his autobiography American Sniper, and the 2014 Clint Eastwood blockbuster with the same title. Kris Kyle was murdered before completion of the film. In the book, he told a story about how a bar fight broke out and he “decked” an individual after making a comment about the Navy SEAL’s, “They deserve to lose a few.” Although the book did not specifically mention Ventura by name, he was identified by Kyle in subsequent interviews.
Defamation and Libel are incredibly hard to prove in the courts already. In order to win a libel case, all the conditions of a six part test must be fulfilled. These conditions are identification, defamatory language, falsity, publication, fault resulting from “ill will” or negligence, and damages. The question is whether or not people can lie deliberately and not only get away with it, also profit from it. Harper-Collins made over $40 million on the book, Kyle estate made about $6 million. The movie, war propaganda at its finest, generated $ 300 million internationally.
The consequences of a reversal will be devastating to individuals who do not have the financial resources to adequately defend themselves against, libel, slander, and defamation by major corporations. Defamation for profit will become legal. “What they are asking for is the ability to defame someone, make profit from it, and have the person who is defamed has no right(s). They get to keep all the profits,” he said, adding, “Where is the ACLU & other civil liberties groups and Media Groups?”
Apparently, these courts don’t do cases between June and August; so, it remains to be seen what the outcome will be.
This unprecedented case, which will no-doubt be one of those controversial 5-4 Supreme Court decisions, if allowed, could overturn all libel and slander laws. This massive assault can also overturn the entire system of redress for grievances. The precedent set in this case, a potential landmark, can bring all the people down. Malice of forethought with intent to do harm will be unlimited and go unchecked. With the immunity to lie about people for profit, anyone can be called a bomber, child molester, terrorist, or criminal by establishment media with no consequences.
While the concerns of the press are legitimate and there has certainly been physical forced used against journalists by the military in the past, a closer look into the claims shows part of the story to be inaccurate and other pertinent details that would alleviate concerns were omitted. A comprehensive overview of the dynamic policies involved reveals a reason these developments can still be quite disturbing, but not for the original reasons given.
In 2010, a video was released by Wikileaks.org that captured global attention. The viral internet video was taken from military helicopter footage. Showing unarmed journalists in Iraq being mowed down from the air by the blasting fury of heavy helicopter machine gun fire, it was infamously dubbed “Collateral Murder.” This attack footage, and other videos like it were a damning indictment on the military establishment. This event culminated in the court-martial of Bradley/ Chelsea Manning, resulting in a conviction and 35 years in prison.
In a joint effort to create continuity for the conduct for military personnel throughout the services, the Department of Defense (DoD) published a unified Law of War manual on June 12, 2015. This Behemoth Bible, as Vice.com called it, contains 1176 pages. Previously, each branch of the military contained their own regulations for wartime. The Geneva Conventions Code of Conduct for the behavior of US service members in captivity does contain six universal articles that are part of required basic training for all recruits. The rest were service specific; Until now.
The Law of War Manual defines journalists as mostly civilian, military personnel, and authorized correspondents attached to military units. The cause for alarm stemmed from a phrase that describes that some journalists could also be “unprivileged belligerents.” This term is new to the military lexicon as it pertains to journalists. It is deemed by analysts as a broader replacement for the term unlawful “enemy combatant,” which appears dozens of times elsewhere in the document.
What is the meaning this “unprivileged belligerent.” term? According to an RT newscast, the term is undefined by the Pentagon. Georgetown University Professor of Journalism Chris Chambers told RT in an interview that the Geneva Convention, the internationally recognized law of war “doesn’t have this thing on ‘unprivileged belligerents’, continuing, “It gives them license to attack or even murder journalists that they don’t particularly like but aren’t on the other side.
Pentagon officials have declined to comment; however, that does not mean there is no official definition. It may not be necessary for the DoD to provide a definition if one examines the US Code of Federal Regulations. A definition appears in Title 10, US Code, Section 948a. “Privileged belligerent” means an individual belonging to one of the eight categories enumerated in Article 4 of the Geneva Convention relative to the treatment of Prisoners of War.
These eight categories include Prisoners of war who have fallen to the enemy, armed forces or militias and volunteer corps, armed forces claiming alliance to unrecognized governments, persons accompanying armed forces, merchant marines, inhabitants who resist invasion, persons who were unsuccessful in returning to their forces. Medical personnel and Chaplains are respected as non-combatants by Article 33 of the Geneva Convention.
The term “unprivileged enemy belligerent” means an individual (other than a privileged belligerent) who: has engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners; has purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners; or was a part of al Qaeda.
The existence of a definition itself does not alleviate all concerns because the definitions themselves may prove to be inadequate in dynamic and fluid or irregular environment where various forms of asymmetric warfare are implemented. Furthermore, the US Code has the word “enemy” in the term and the DoD manual. Does this mean the military can simply murder journalists they don’t like that are neutral or not affiliated with the enemy? A growing number of experts seem to think so. This concern is warranted, however, not for the original stated reasons. The Impact of merging this regulatory term with some very interesting legislation has the potential to be devastating.
Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA) authorizes the president identify the enemy based on secret criteria and even appoint them as commissioned officers in the enemy forces. No due process is involved. This may seem fine during the clear and present dangers where the public safety may require it on foreign battlefield of war, but there is a new problem.
Constitutional attorney Stewart Rhodes authored the essay “Solving the mystery of enemy combatant status” in 2004, two years before the MCA when he graduated from Yale. Sections 1021, 1024, 1031, and 1032 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2012 declares the entire world is a battlefield. Rhodes, an army veteran and founder of Oathkeepers.org, says, “NDAA is treason,” because of its indefinite detention without charges provisions in those sections. Proponents of the NDAA refused to acknowledge on the Senate floor that the law does not pertain to Americans in the United States.
In a 2013 Pentagon Press Conference, Assistant Secretary of Defense Public Affairs Dr. George Little responded to uniformed subordinates who lamented to being forced to “put out mindless propaganda,” by promising to” engage the media.” Capability, opportunity, and intent have combined with the effects of the MCA, NDAA, the DoD Law of War manual to establish the theoretical legal framework for the justification of the disposal of non-enemy reporters. Indeed, journalism will continue to be a very dangerous profession.
This process can also be applied to all Americans:
1)Declare someone to be an “Unprivileged Belligerent” under the DoD “Law of War” manual.
2)Give them an MCA Commission in the enemy forces without informing them or the enemy.
3)Arrest, Detain, Rendition, Torture, or Kill them in the global battlefield under the NDAA.
King George III of England. by Johann Zoffany, 1771
One of twenty seven grievances listed against King George III in the Declaration of Independence is: He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended legislation.
Hotel de Bilderberg at Oosterbeek, Netherlands. Booking.com photo
They are a globalist, collectivist government cabal, run by corporations and international banking cartels. Through their ownership of the mainstream media outlets , they have kept their activities secret from Americans for decades by a directed press blackout.
“Prince Bernhard 1942” by Yousuf Karsh
The Bilderberg Group was founded on May 29, 1954 at the Bilderberg Hotel in Oosterbeek, Netherlands, and was hosted by Prince Bernhardt. They meet annually at different hotels in different counties throughout Europe, North America, and Asia. At least 120-150 of the most influential global power brokers gather in total secrecy. Under maximum overkill security conditions . This international conference of kings and queens, captains of industry, bankers, technology giants, mainstream media, and heads of state, and future political players gather to determine a consensus about political policies of the member nations and determine how to move forward with their agenda. Today, Queen Beatrix, the owner of Shell Gasoline and the daughter of Prince Bernhardt, is the Honorary Bilderberg Chairperson, making her one of the most powerful women in the world.
After Over 50 years of denial, the advent of the internet and the rise of citizen journalism through the alternative media has forced them to publish a nonthreatening and incredibly boring Official Website.
According to Title 18 US Code, Section 953 (The Logan Act) makes it illegal for public figures to conduct secret meetings with foreign elitists to set public policy in America because of the corruption that it breeds. Attendance is a FELONY punishable by three years in prison.
The Kingmakers: Mark Dice, a Media Analyst with a Bachelor’s in Communications, comments on Bill Clinton attending Bilderberg just before becoming president.
What do they want? According to William Guy Carr’s Pawns in the Game (1956) and Eustace Mullins on page 55 of his 1983 book, Secrets of the Federal Reserve, a similar meeting took place in Frankfurt Germany in 1773. Hosted by the Rothschild banking family, it calls for nothing short of “global governance” through a “New World Order,” terms that world leaders like Adolf Hitler, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Senator Gary Hart, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Herman von Rumpoy, Al Gore, Henry Kissinger, John Kerry, Steven Harper, Joe Biden, even Barak Obama have openly boasted.
How did they accomplish this?
In Endgame: Blueprint for Global Enslavement, a documentary film by Alex Jones, we meet Jim Tucker, the late investigative journalist who has tracked Bilderberg for decades. Also, Daniel Estulin talks about his international bestselling book The Bilderberg Group, translated into 21 languages. Included throughout are damning indictments of the globalists in their own words.
2011, because that’s how long it takes, in which they openly admit it was always their intention to create the Euro Dollar and Economic Euro Zone 44 years prior to the 1999 implementation.
The Euro Zone is such a disaster for debtor nations like Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain as their unemployment rates have soared and they are taxed as a perpetuity for bank defaulting of loans. Creditor nations like Germany have populations that are resentful of loans their banks have made that cannot be repaid. As a result, the wealth of all nations involved is plundered and the middle classes are crushed.
North American Union US Executive Trade Office photo.
Kissinger when Democrat President Bill Clinton signed it it 1993. The Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) of North America was signed by Republican President Bush and also supported by Kissinger. These are steps that lead America closer to a North American Union. What will happen to the constitutions of Canada, Mexico, and the United States when they are merged?
The Current Agenda
The 29 chapters and 30,000 pages of the still secretive Trans Pacific Partnership creates an Asian Union and global government that is run by corporations. British investigative reporter Paul Joseph Watson from Infowars.com reports on the current state of Bilderberg 2015.
The official guests list does not include Jeb Bush or the Queen of England, who are also originally scheduled to be in the area during the meeting.
The 2015 Bilderberg Meeting 2015 is taking place at at the five star Interalpen Hotel Tyrol at Telfs-Buchen/Seefeld, Austria during the week of 11-15 June. The meeting not just criminal itself, there will be plenty of international criminals on the guest list. The attendees are a who’s who of representatives from the banking community, Many of the bankers who just paid $5.9 Billion in fines for market currency rigging (an infinitesimal fraction of what they made from the scam). General David Patreus, fresh from his conviction for leaking classified information will also be there. His proclaimed “hero,” the 92 year old Henry Kissinger, a man implicated for multiple war crimes across the globe for decades, and even has arrest warrants issued against him in Europe, will continue his regular visit.
Here is the Agenda from the Official Web Site. Do you like international criminals deciding these topic policies for your country in secret illegal meetings?
The Global Connections of Bilderberg 2012. bussinessinsider.com (click to enlarge)
Chemical Weapons Threats
Current Economic Issues
The Radio show EARTH: Bilderberg & the TPP (Part 2)
How about the unofficial list?
Fierce resistance to the International corporate takeover of governments of sovereign nations through the TPP, the war on cash and precious metals, discrediting the UK from leaving the EU, and bypassing the US Congress, isolating Russia, opposing China and the BRICS counties resistance to the petrol-dollar system. and the Messina Group endorsement of Hillary Clinton for 2016 US presidency.
Sixty Years without comprehensive news coverage! Have you ever heard anything about this group in your life? The Total media blackout In America continues.
The Amendment Avenger salutes the entire team at Infowars for remaining at the tip of the spear in the front line consistent reporting with boots on the ground at every Bilderberg meeting for the past decade.
In spite of it being carried on the popular news site in the world with over 11 billion visits a year, the Drudge Reoprt, there is no mention of it in the media without an occasional forced mention to remain relevant with added caveats of conspiracy theories. If 150 sports or Hollywood celebrities were having a secret party under maximum taxpayer funded security, it would be news. Is it normal for people to want answers about 150 world leaders meeting in secret?
So why do media pundits ignore this story?
David Rockefeller. Photo by Jason Kempin /Getty Images
The words: “We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years……It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries,” are attributed to Trillionaire David Rockefeller at the 1991 meeting. This serves as a probable explanation for the lack of attention and even the outright denial of any knowledge of the existance of the group by the mainstream traditional media year after year.
Obama and Hillary Clinton are reported to have attended the meeting after he ditched the press in 2008 during the presidential campaign in Chantilly VA. The Manhunt for the two candidates proved fruitless for 48 over hours. To this day, they’re not talking about it.
Just as the North American Union (NAU) Parliament has been conducting their illegal meetings which have been mostly ignored by the mainstream media through the doctrine of implementation of stealth, preparing the Amero in the spirit of Bilderberg. These meetings will continue as Americans remain in the dark. Ask any random person on the street in America,”What is the Bilderberg group?”, some people will even respond, “What? Build-a-Bear?”
The bounty is out on the greatest menace to all the liberties of human beings on planet Earth ever devised. Crowd-sourcing on the internet has enabled websites like Just Foreign Policy to raise hundreds of thousands of dollars through international donations to find out what’s really in the ultra-secretive Trans Pacific Partnership treaty (TPP).
Wikileaks, an internet activist group, has been given a task by concerned citizens of the world to leak the text of the most important trade deal in history, controlling over 40% of the global economy. Wikileaks Director Julian Assange has released three of the twenty nine known chapters. The first chapter is over 30,000 pages long. According to Assange, “Only five chapters deal with trade.”
Simply put. It would establish a new pillar of global unelected government run by corporations with impunity and in secret.
Members of Congress like Senator Wyden of Oregon or Representative Alan Grayson of Florida, who want to see the classified legislation, must submit a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, be escorted by armed guards to a locked room where they can read it one page at a time. They are forbidden to take notes or pictures and even discuss what they read. Most members of Congress have not even read this abridged version.
While thousands of people have worked on this deal for over fifteen years, especially during the last three years, only 600 elite individuals may have full access. About 500 of these individuals are corporate lobbyists for multinational corporations (Nimmo 2013).
The worldwide efforts of the people to find the details is incrementally paying off. The results are in and there has been quite an alarm generated in the online community.
EARTH: Dr Truth & Doc Drake
The Radio Show Earth: Bilderberg & the TPP (Part 1)
AA in studio
Here’s what we know after only 3 of the 29 chapters were leaked
Three Strikes and your web page is deleted and you’re off the Internet Rule
Intellectual Property is not yours if you use a third party service (Youtube/ Vimeo)
Criminalization of Unauthorized Downloads
IP address monitors and reports your every move
Incorporates all the legislative sections rejected for PIPA, CISPA, SOPA, and ACTA
Proprietary computer software in cars gives your vehicle ownership to manufacturer
Corporations can ignore the laws of all nations if they interfere with profits
Corporations can amend the agreement as they go forever
No Congressional or legislative oversight worldwide
Multinational Corporations can sue governments services for expected future loses through the Extrajudicial Non-elected Investor State Tribunals
Biotech giants like Monsanto can impose economic sanctions on nations or entire continents that ban any of their products like Europe has done to GMO’s
Expansion of environmental global carbon taxes on smaller corporations
Registered Owners can not perform maintenance on their vehicle
Seizes control over vitamins and minerals
Fixes the price of medicines
Extending Patents and Copyrights to Pharmaceuticals ensuring monopoly prices and preventing poor people from receiving generic brands
Bans cash worldwide in favor of global cashless society
Massive worldwide sweeping gun legislation
Regulates personal income and minimum wage
Establishes and regulates new surveillance systems
Tracking and taxing people per mile of driving
Negotiated in secret by 600 people
500 are corporate lobbyists. None work for Congress
Fast Track means no debate
29 Chapters, Only 5 deal with trade
Only 3 Chapters are known because they were leaked
Congress must fill out a FOIA request to see it
If approved, they are escorted to a locked room
Only one page at a time, no notes, no pictures
Classified, Congress may not discuss it
Even though the world sees it, Congress is forbidden to read the leaked information
Fast Track gives the president unlimited power to negotiate and amend in secret
Secret Amendment Powers for the president and corporations are indefinite, even after the treaty is signed
No debate is authorized for even an abridged version
Controls 40% of the World Economy and we are not allowed to see it
Establishes the framework for the Asian Union to be merged with EU, NAU, and Africa
Establishes a global government run by Corporations!
Oh yes, and it will also kill jobs in America and outsource others
The Republican Senate joined a minority of Democrats to give “Fast Track” authorization to Obama to negotiate the TPP without their knowledge. Rep. Grayson referred to the provisions as “Massive giveaways of our sovereignty and massive undermining of our middle class” (Nimmo 2013).
No transparency. No congressional oversight. Changing the rules after codification is the antithesis of the rule of law.Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky attacked President Obama and demanded the TPP text be released so that it can be debated (Shabad 2015).
The House has just voted it down. That is good news for now; however, the battle is not over and they will be back for blood. They may try to slip it through under the radar on a weekend when most of Congress is not looking. Most Democrats opposed this “deal” under the pretense that it is a bad for America because it will outsource American jobs beyond the consequences of past treaties they supported during the Clinton administration like NAFTA and GATT.
Speaker of the House John Boehner, a Republican, was with the Obama on this one, pushing for Fast Track authority. Unlike Boehner’s predecessor, Nancy Pelosi, who spoke concerning health care bill, “We need to vote on the bill so that we can see what’s in it,” Senator Rand Paul stated “I believe we should be able to read the legislation before vote on it”
Three of the Twenty Seven grievances against King George III of England in the Declaration of Independence were:
1) No taxation without representation.We all should know that one from elementary school.
2) He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended legislation.
3) He has erected a multitude of offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass the people and eat out their substance.
With twenty six chapters still concealed, what other alarming and devastating surprises await?
The internet can be used to empower humanity or enslave it. With the ramrodding of the TPP, the Bilderberg meeting, and Operation Jade Helm, this summer will be interesting. When the Constitution is eviscerated, what kind of society will be built on the ashes? The internet is not only affecting new laws, it’s altering how policymakers are held accountable in the public eye, web users are shifting geopolitical paradigms in the tectonic struggles of the human species.
Amendment Avenger salutes Infowars.com for being at the tip of the spear in the battle to expose and defeat this elephant in the battlefield and killing this threat to freedom everywhere. The Republic and the planet was almost ruthlessly gang-raped for what Economic Hit Man John Perkins calls the “Corporatocricy.” They would have eviscerated most of what is left of America on the alter of globalism. This was close. If you’re not on high alert, your not paying attention. The lobbyists have gone way too far this time.
Good work America. Give Thanks. God has literally granted us a temporary reprieve. What do we do with it in our personal lives and how do we hold these criminals accountable?
The battle rages on.
Wikileaks has released all the chapters of the Trans-Pacific Partnership: